The treaty treaty lost ground back to be only the slogan of a campaign to Phadindra Nepal says, "China is Hong Kong back to take the match, India Goa back, perhaps we should not match?" He once in power the political parties Sugauli Treaty, lost ground back the demands courageously to keep says.
Is presented, the greater the greater the hypothesis of Nepal Nepal Nepal Nepal Nationalist Front, chairman of the national movement, and some part of the conversation has been about the feasibility of Greater Nepal:
Nepal Nepal's nationality was facing fragile situations, you spoke of greater Nepal, it is not and phantusa?
There was not anything that we are not trying to be. Regaining lost ground back by us to be able to provide for the "campaign for greater political unity we have.
Nepal can be lost is the basis of the Treaty see?
The treaty would not have sandhimai point. The treaty ceding land for ever should leave Nepal, but that the treaty was. However, in 1816, to March 4, Nepal The treaty was signed by the treaty of 1816, less than a year to its December 8, I proposed to the British Koshi gandakisammako back foot. Nepal's king to accept the offer made on 11 December 1818. The treaty is that the treaty was not permanently back in the process and know that less than a year has been confirmed. Lucknow, India in 1857 is intended to suppress the Sepoy Mutiny of 1860, we made an agreement with Junga vritisaharule intense collaboration in the history of the witness back to the valley raptidekhi kalisammako.
Nepal army to crush the rebellion after Britain at the time of cooperation found some terrain, Britain still have to wear such a gun is it? What policy should we have to take back lost ground?
There must be political consensus within the parties in Nepal. Vatican uthaunuparyo this. Had become the subject of national debate. Millions of people have said that mass uthairakheka government and the parliament should have the debate. But the debate has not been able to be a place of debate. Nationalism is the most pressing sattasina parties argue calaunuparyo own party, the government had to start discussion, the House had to run. The debate did not escape anyone. The debate did not take care of him after that, India is angry that. But unfortunately, Nepal, India, who is interested in leadership nepalakobhanda are many.
You really not coming to power, the greater sattasina parties in Nepal to enjoy the agenda after this campaign, why did it have to drive?
Nepali people and for the nation to take back their lost land are ready for any fi!ght that is clearly discouraged. But the state is run by the parties bharatapaksiya not been able to find it ejendale priority.
Front on behalf of our endeavor repeatedly former Tihar mindset. The treaty among 601 parliamentarians to discuss the withdrawal of the treaty land lost to delayed ¥ voice we enjoyed it. But for them, afraid to discuss. Their courage to do. So all I intend to say that we had not.
Hong Kong back to China, perhaps, is from Goa, India, to take back the match, Macau, China could take back that we can not take back not intend. Japan is also fed back to the land on behalf of Lomonosov. As in colonial Timor, Indonesia had been free. There are many such examples. And another land that is always found in the world, there are many examples to capture. But we need to ask is, who is from the country, he is not blind. Nepal has been said about the illustration of the mill khaskhas most Hato. First, as has been hostile tatinubhanda bimda griddle. Nepali people should now force the griddle, wa!rm.
No political parties in Nepal 'Greater Nepal' agenda could not, people do not even have the strength for that, then all the odds, not only to India, then?
It is self evident, that our leaders are, on the Immigration. Some political leaders in India unequal treaties and agreements should be repealed, says the measure is OK. The treaty Treaty is the most unequal treaties must be a number list, that you can speak for them, occurred. But a number of them can leave the list in 1 9 50 The treaty is the only thing to do. The treaty is not a treaty as different from any other. In 1 9 50 Section 1 and 8 in the sandhikai The treaty is written that the treaty should be back lost ground. The termination of the treaty with Britain that many of the agreements mentioned. The treaty is the treaty is ¥ tamamabhitra Pa.
The treaty that the treaty lost our land needed to talk to the Britain in India, Nepal?
You made an interesting question. In fact, it is viewed as a step. In 1 9 47 agas
No comments:
Post a Comment